Howdy all,
My friend and I are about to move onto OWL from Induction on Monday. We extended our Induction from two weeks to three weeks because we had a party last Saturday that set us back a bit. However, since returning to Induction last Monday, we've actually managed to continue to lose significantly. I started at 196 and I'm down to 187. My goal is 185 to begin OWL. He started at 195 and is down to 187. He's ready to begin OWL whenever. I figure that at this pace of weight loss, I should be down to 185 by Monday.
My ultimate goal is to get into the 170 to 175 range. At around 1 pound a week on OWL, I know that means it will take me 10 to 15 weeks. However, someone else on this board mentioned taht they lost a ton of weight when they first started OWL but not too much on induction. Any similar experiences? Further, I'm figuring that I lost a good amount of weight on induction that was actual fat because I kept up my water consumption, hopefully preventing water loss. I'm sure, though, that some of it was just excess water. But is there generally a difference in the type of weight or fat loss experienced on OWL vs. Induction? Will this be more of actual mass vs. water loss? Is this what accounts for the 1 pound per week vs. the 4 to 7 on Induction?
Lots of questions. I'd appreciate your thoughts. I'm going to start planning for OWL now.
Jason
My friend and I are about to move onto OWL from Induction on Monday. We extended our Induction from two weeks to three weeks because we had a party last Saturday that set us back a bit. However, since returning to Induction last Monday, we've actually managed to continue to lose significantly. I started at 196 and I'm down to 187. My goal is 185 to begin OWL. He started at 195 and is down to 187. He's ready to begin OWL whenever. I figure that at this pace of weight loss, I should be down to 185 by Monday.
My ultimate goal is to get into the 170 to 175 range. At around 1 pound a week on OWL, I know that means it will take me 10 to 15 weeks. However, someone else on this board mentioned taht they lost a ton of weight when they first started OWL but not too much on induction. Any similar experiences? Further, I'm figuring that I lost a good amount of weight on induction that was actual fat because I kept up my water consumption, hopefully preventing water loss. I'm sure, though, that some of it was just excess water. But is there generally a difference in the type of weight or fat loss experienced on OWL vs. Induction? Will this be more of actual mass vs. water loss? Is this what accounts for the 1 pound per week vs. the 4 to 7 on Induction?
Lots of questions. I'd appreciate your thoughts. I'm going to start planning for OWL now.
Jason






Comment