I plan to buy a new bicycle in the spring and have been surveying the market.
Today I had confirmed what I already knew - even for my height (6ft 3in) I have exceptionally long legs and a short torso. On the bike fitting jig the critical leg lenght came out at 39 in. They stood me over a 2 in diameter tube and asked me to pull it up (right up to the squeaky voice), then I had to move my feet out on both sides to platforms 1/2 in lower. All my weight was now on the tube, and that is how they took the measurement.
It strikes me that the weight tables must presume an average ratios of legs to torso. Serious departure from the average must change the optimum weight.
Does anyone know if this is a significant effect? I am guessing that long legs and a small torso should depress the target weight. Does anyone know?
Today I had confirmed what I already knew - even for my height (6ft 3in) I have exceptionally long legs and a short torso. On the bike fitting jig the critical leg lenght came out at 39 in. They stood me over a 2 in diameter tube and asked me to pull it up (right up to the squeaky voice), then I had to move my feet out on both sides to platforms 1/2 in lower. All my weight was now on the tube, and that is how they took the measurement.
It strikes me that the weight tables must presume an average ratios of legs to torso. Serious departure from the average must change the optimum weight.
Does anyone know if this is a significant effect? I am guessing that long legs and a small torso should depress the target weight. Does anyone know?





Comment