Since starting this WOL - My life and the 'way' I look at life has changed dramatically. Yes I have lost weight almost effortlessly (no hunger) but there are a whole range of other health benefits: improved nails and skins, clearer thinking, no gastric reflux, sleep apnea improving.
I have tried many 'diets' over the years, and they all amounted to the old lowifat, calories in, calories out idea. They have all failed and were never sustainable.
What I see often on other boards and in life are people saying 'whatever works for you', everyone is different. This is in relation to people not eating Low Carb. I'm sure there are heaps of members here who think similar.
But is it the case ?
The more I live this WOL, the more I begin to think that this is the optimal WOL for the majority of people. Of course I'm talking about people who don't necessarily have medical conditions.
Can we standby and be silent as people are 'trying' Jenny Craig and going back to Weight Watchers because Atkins just isn't working.
Is Low Carb/Atkins only a choice or a 'trick' or is it the health-giving optimal diet for the majority of humans that I think it is ?
I have tried many 'diets' over the years, and they all amounted to the old lowifat, calories in, calories out idea. They have all failed and were never sustainable.
What I see often on other boards and in life are people saying 'whatever works for you', everyone is different. This is in relation to people not eating Low Carb. I'm sure there are heaps of members here who think similar.
But is it the case ?
The more I live this WOL, the more I begin to think that this is the optimal WOL for the majority of people. Of course I'm talking about people who don't necessarily have medical conditions.
Can we standby and be silent as people are 'trying' Jenny Craig and going back to Weight Watchers because Atkins just isn't working.
Is Low Carb/Atkins only a choice or a 'trick' or is it the health-giving optimal diet for the majority of humans that I think it is ?








/ GW 110

Comment