The latest issue of Consumer Reports did research on the latest and greatest "diets" and diet books.
As far as the new books, they reported that there was no clinical study performed on any of the "new" book diets but it was there opinion on what they liked.
As far as the diets themselves,they listed Atkins as the least favorable diet. Slim Fast, Weight Watchers, Ornish, etc... were all listed as better. The ironic thing is that they did mention that Atkins DID lower bad choleserol and tri's better than the other diets, but that the diet was too restrictive for long term attendance. They also mentioned that a lot of the other diets had a high failure rate.
What amazes me is that CR leans towards a diet that is more "balanced" than Atkns, but none of the other diets mentioned (other than Atkins) lowers cholesterol.
Slim Fast... you've got to be kidding! Who wants to drink their meals?
As far as the new books, they reported that there was no clinical study performed on any of the "new" book diets but it was there opinion on what they liked.
As far as the diets themselves,they listed Atkins as the least favorable diet. Slim Fast, Weight Watchers, Ornish, etc... were all listed as better. The ironic thing is that they did mention that Atkins DID lower bad choleserol and tri's better than the other diets, but that the diet was too restrictive for long term attendance. They also mentioned that a lot of the other diets had a high failure rate.
What amazes me is that CR leans towards a diet that is more "balanced" than Atkns, but none of the other diets mentioned (other than Atkins) lowers cholesterol.
Slim Fast... you've got to be kidding! Who wants to drink their meals?







x20

Comment