I started thinking about what makes maintenance such a hard thing to do. I don't accept the notion that "our bodies are all different." 95% of Americans before 1970 were not overweight. So 95% of us are the same. 95% of us can eat 70-100grams of carbs while maintaining a decent body fat. (If you insist you are in the special 5%, stop reading).
I think the social aspects of low carbing is what's difficult. Real people work. We go OUT TO LUNCH and we eat with friends/co-workers. And lunch in the modern world = sandwich or fast food. You don't want to be the only idiot with a lettuce bun burger.
So let's get real. We can make our own low carb breakfast and dinner, but we're at the mercy of the world when it's lunch. But two slices of bread are only 30-40g carbs. Even a burger at McDonald's only yields 40-50g carbs max.
I've started eating fried chicken and nuggets and other things and I'm still losing weight. Eliminating these foods seems so over the top and unnecessary. Depriving yourself makes you lose weight fast NOW, but makes you fail down the road and binge on cakes. So eat a normal carby "main food" but take out the super carby sides like french fries, baked potatoes and chips. Sodas are obviously on the "no" list.
So what I'm saying is we can still participate in the great American lunch without needlessly drawing attention to ourselves. Once you cut out the potato chips or fries, then the carbs are pretty much from the bun or the sandwich bread.
We don't need to feel like victims. We can still eat with everyone else. And that makes it much more likely that we can do this forever. What do you think?
I think the social aspects of low carbing is what's difficult. Real people work. We go OUT TO LUNCH and we eat with friends/co-workers. And lunch in the modern world = sandwich or fast food. You don't want to be the only idiot with a lettuce bun burger.
So let's get real. We can make our own low carb breakfast and dinner, but we're at the mercy of the world when it's lunch. But two slices of bread are only 30-40g carbs. Even a burger at McDonald's only yields 40-50g carbs max.
I've started eating fried chicken and nuggets and other things and I'm still losing weight. Eliminating these foods seems so over the top and unnecessary. Depriving yourself makes you lose weight fast NOW, but makes you fail down the road and binge on cakes. So eat a normal carby "main food" but take out the super carby sides like french fries, baked potatoes and chips. Sodas are obviously on the "no" list.
So what I'm saying is we can still participate in the great American lunch without needlessly drawing attention to ourselves. Once you cut out the potato chips or fries, then the carbs are pretty much from the bun or the sandwich bread.
We don't need to feel like victims. We can still eat with everyone else. And that makes it much more likely that we can do this forever. What do you think?



/160





. I'm gonna have to disagree with you [guess I'm in the 5% club]. Proir to 1970 our food supply wasn't nearly as processed as it is today. Sugar has become an ingredient in almost everything we eat even to the point of injecting meats with some type of solution containing it. We may be at the mercy of a food industry that may be very profit driven and not have our best interest at heart. Many people at work have tried their "own" versions of this diet and lost weight however when they slip back into their old habits [which were very similar to mine] again most all do regain. I know that there is some very complicated science behind all this but there is also some that's very simple. The keep it simple principle works for me. 






Comment