You're probabaly wondering why this post isn't on the Extended Induction board. Hear me out and I'll explain.
When I was losing 5lbs/mo on extended induction, I jokingly said that if I kept losing weight at that constant rate then in three years I'd cease to exist (since my weight would have dropped to zero). Of course we all know that's impossible.
Hypothetically, let's say someone is properly doing induction for an indefinite period (please note this is NOT a recommendation to do so) and is eating enough to stay off starvation mode. Obviously, there'll be a point or lower bound where that person will stop losing weight. From what we know of the Atkins WOE, there's no way for someone properly doing Atkins to be anorexic.
So assuming there's a lower bound, or a point where one can't lose weight on Atkins anymore, is that lower bound a person's real ideal weight?
When I was losing 5lbs/mo on extended induction, I jokingly said that if I kept losing weight at that constant rate then in three years I'd cease to exist (since my weight would have dropped to zero). Of course we all know that's impossible.
Hypothetically, let's say someone is properly doing induction for an indefinite period (please note this is NOT a recommendation to do so) and is eating enough to stay off starvation mode. Obviously, there'll be a point or lower bound where that person will stop losing weight. From what we know of the Atkins WOE, there's no way for someone properly doing Atkins to be anorexic.
So assuming there's a lower bound, or a point where one can't lose weight on Atkins anymore, is that lower bound a person's real ideal weight?


Comment