Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nutrition Label question (looks wrong to me!)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nutrition Label question (looks wrong to me!)

    I buy a lot of spinach and baby spinach, of varying brands, depending on what's on sale, so I just put a generic "baby spinach" food item into my fitday and use that no matter what brand I'm using. Spinach should be spinach, right? Pretty much all of the ones I've bought have an 85g serving with 3 carbs, 2 fiber for 1 net carbs. 85g is a little over 3 oz, or about 3 cups of loosely packed spinach.

    Most recently though, I bought a large bulk bag at Sam's Club and the nutrition information is schizophrenic!

    Take a look at this:

    Serving size: 1 1/4 cup (85g)
    Sevings per container: about 8

    Calories 40 Calories From Fat 0

    Total Fat 0
    .....Saturated Fat 0
    Cholesterol 0mg
    Sodium 160mg
    Total Carbohydrate
    10g
    .....Dietary Fiber 5g
    .....Sugars 0g
    Protein 2g

    Ingredients: Baby Leaf Spinach

    First of all, I'm not sure they could fit 85g of raw spinach into 1 1/4 cup no matter how tightly they packed it. But even if so this is showing 5 net carbs for an 85g serving, which is FIVE TIMES what any other brand indicates for the same food. It also has double the calories and almost triple the sodium.

    I'd love some feedback on what you guys think! Have they made some super-spinach that has entirely different nutritional information, or is their label simply wrong wrong wrong?

    To contrast, this is the information for Dole Organic Baby Spinach. Fresh Express has the same exact nutritional information for a serving size of 3.0 oz. (everything is identical).

    Serving size: 3.5 cups
    Sevings per container: about 2

    Calories 20 Calories From Fat 0

    Total Fat 0
    .....Saturated Fat 0
    Cholesterol 0mg
    Sodium 65mg
    Total Carbohydrate
    3g
    .....Dietary Fiber 2g
    .....Sugars 0g
    Protein 2g
    Female / Currently on Extended Induction (again), begun 6/2/08.

    I did Extended Induction from 1/3 to 5/9 (2006) and lost 55 pounds, so I know I can do it again!

    The reason I quit...
    sigpic
    Worth it !!!


  • #2
    Re: Nutrition Label question (looks wrong to me!)

    The Sam's club bag dosent' say "cooked" does it?


    5'4"
    45 yrs (F) a.k.a. "Butterbean"
    Start date 5/18/2003
    197/163.5/130

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Nutrition Label question (looks wrong to me!)

      It sure doesn't. Would that increase the carbs/calories to such an extent for the same weight (not volume)? Seems like they just must have something wrong, or I'm going nuts.
      Female / Currently on Extended Induction (again), begun 6/2/08.

      I did Extended Induction from 1/3 to 5/9 (2006) and lost 55 pounds, so I know I can do it again!

      The reason I quit...
      sigpic
      Worth it !!!

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Nutrition Label question (looks wrong to me!)

        Their label is probably wrong...unless they got a hold of some super-spinach..
        ~Megs~
        242/141/160 (130)
        dress size 26/10/8
        5'4", Female, May 2, 2003
        My blog:
        http://mformiscellaneous.blogspot.com/

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Nutrition Label question (looks wrong to me!)

          Thanks for the affirmation that I'm not just going nuts!
          Female / Currently on Extended Induction (again), begun 6/2/08.

          I did Extended Induction from 1/3 to 5/9 (2006) and lost 55 pounds, so I know I can do it again!

          The reason I quit...
          sigpic
          Worth it !!!

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Nutrition Label question (looks wrong to me!)

            ask them about it. there are many mnay varieties of spinach just as their are many varieties of tomatoes and some have more water and others have more sugar.

            your Sam's club bad does have a 2 gram error though as a hidden carb count check shows [40 total cals - 2 g protein X4cal/g]divided by 4 cal/garm shoud equal your total carbohydrates since they say it is fat free. and 40-8 is 32 which divided by 4 is 8 not 10 so they got something wrong there.
            by the book atkinseer

            started 6/1/02 at 313
            goalie 5/04 at 167 with under 15% body fat ADBB Presidents exercise Challenge


            Comment

            Working...
            X