Hello all-
Let me start by saying I'm pro-Atkins and in my second week of what I feel is a pretty successful induction. I'm doing it because it allows me to eat more than a traditional diet (in the earlier phases anyway) would. That being said I have a question.
If the eventual goal of Atkins is to maintain your ideal weight by eating a mixture of portion-controlled healthy foods, why do it at all? If you cheat from time to time (which EVERYONE will) you mess yourself up more than if you follow a non-Atkins portion-controlled lifestyle. For people who are really in to fine dining and like different kinds of cuisine from around the world, having to exclude the things Atkins wants you to exclude is really very unrealistic.
I understand the diabetic argument but if a person makes healthy eating the norm and being "bad" a once-in-a-while thing (like Atkins says), they don't HAVE to be on Atkins to control blood sugar.
Thoughts?
Let me start by saying I'm pro-Atkins and in my second week of what I feel is a pretty successful induction. I'm doing it because it allows me to eat more than a traditional diet (in the earlier phases anyway) would. That being said I have a question.
If the eventual goal of Atkins is to maintain your ideal weight by eating a mixture of portion-controlled healthy foods, why do it at all? If you cheat from time to time (which EVERYONE will) you mess yourself up more than if you follow a non-Atkins portion-controlled lifestyle. For people who are really in to fine dining and like different kinds of cuisine from around the world, having to exclude the things Atkins wants you to exclude is really very unrealistic.
I understand the diabetic argument but if a person makes healthy eating the norm and being "bad" a once-in-a-while thing (like Atkins says), they don't HAVE to be on Atkins to control blood sugar.
Thoughts?








Comment